01
Evaluator-style scorecard
A concise red, amber and green assessment, with mandatory and high-value issues surfaced first.
Independent WHS tender review
Before you submit, see what the evaluator will see.
Expert review of the WHS component of Australian construction tenders. We show what is missing, unsupported, inconsistent or too generic—before it reaches the evaluator.
Fixed price48-hour turnaroundHuman expert review
WHS BidCheck review
Tender response scorecard
82
Mandatory requirementsComplete
Evidence and project examplesReview
Methodology consistencyGap
Evidence: verify every stated capability.
Gaps: resolve before the response is final.
Action: focus effort where it can be scored.
The issue
Your safety system may be sound. Your tender response still has to prove it.
Construction tenders rarely reward broad statements about being committed to safety. Evaluators need to find clear answers, project-specific risks, credible controls and evidence that supports every important claim.
BidSafe reviews your response from the evaluator's perspective: what they can find, what they cannot verify and where your response may be difficult to score.
What you receive
A practical reviewer's pack, not an 80-page audit.
02
Requirement-to-evidence matrix
A direct map of what the tender asks for against what your response and attachments actually prove.
03
Tracked-changes rewrite
Focused edits and suggested wording for the sections that can materially strengthen your submission.
04
Prioritised action list
A practical sequence of what must be fixed, what should improve and what is already credible.
Sample review
Specific, verifiable and ready to action.
A BidCheck distinguishes between polished claims and evidence an evaluator can actually use. The fictional excerpt shows the type of clarity we are looking for.
Review my tender3.4 Methodology
Fictional example
The contractor will implement a comprehensive safety management system in accordance with AS/NZS 4801 and relevant legislation.
Too generic. No project-specific controls or evidence.
The contractor will implement a site-specific WHS management system aligned to the tender scope, including weekly supervisor-led field verification, documented plant pre-start checks and monthly review of leading indicators.
Specific. Verifiable. Tender-ready.
See the gapsClose the gapsSubmit with confidence
How it works
A clear process for a live deadline.
- 1
Confirm the fit
Share the tender, jurisdiction and submission deadline.
- 2
Pay and upload
Provide the tender pack, draft WHS response and supporting evidence.
- 3
We test the response
A senior construction WHS specialist maps and reviews the material.
- 4
Strengthen and submit
Receive the scorecard, marked-up response and action list.
Who it is for
For contractors who can do the work—and need the bid to show it.
BidSafe is designed for Australian civil and construction contractors without a large internal tender and safety team.
- Civil and earthworks contractors
- Drainage and utilities contractors
- Road and infrastructure maintenance businesses
- Landscaping and public-domain contractors
- Specialist subcontractors pursuing government, council or major-contractor work
Not for instant generic WHS systems, ISO certification or inventing experience a contractor does not have.
Pricing
Review the WHS response before it is locked in.
The standard review is scoped to one live tender, its WHS response and the evidence that supports it. Urgent 24-hour reviews are subject to availability.
48-hour WHS BidCheck
$1,250 + GST
- One tender’s WHS requirements
- Up to 15 pages of draft response
- Up to five principal supporting documents
- Scorecard and evidence assessment
- Tracked changes and prioritised actions
- 30-minute review call
- One clarification round
Live offers
Choose your review service
Loading available reviews…
Urgent 24-hour review: $1,850 + GST, subject to availability.
Independent second look
Submit with a clear view of what the evaluator can see.
We do not guarantee a tender outcome or certify legal compliance. We give you a clearer view of completeness, relevance, evidence and clarity.